GOPESH SONI is unethical Lawyer as he served at my residence KEY documents late evening a few hours before the Hearings next day. ITS ILLEGAL TO GIVE OPPOSITE PARTY ELEMENT OF SURPRISE for any matter, specially when those documents of Gopesh were With rejected LAND TITLE NOTE NUMBER.
Gopesh did not want the Defendant Singh to counter check the documents as there were two major lies in those documents:
1. Rejected title number that would have opened the real matter for Justice in the case.
1/a This rejection was done by the land title offices.
2. Fake visiting date to visit the lawyers of Azeem was also mentioned in the same docs
So Gopesh played trick served docs just few hours before the hearing, through his Girl at the offices just so he can fool Judge Justice Snowie.
But he sure fooled the Judge very nicely as when the judge asked when docs were served, he rotated the answer to such a degree that Snowie forgot the questions.
So Gopesh is best fooler of Peel Courts Judges or Justices.
Since Gopesh Soni, did not answer at courts, when asked by Justice Snowie, when he ( GOPESH ) served Mr. Singh, in order to be granted an Abridgments. Gopesh Soni did what no Lawyers should do, lie to the Courts and mis-direct the courts and fool Justice Snowie that has been taught to trust Lawyers ( only ) in her educations of Law as an Justice.
Really Gopesh fooled Justice Snowie like a kid.
You can only fool some one when some one trusts you.
So that also means Justice Snowie trusted all the lies to Gopesh Gandu in the courts.
Justice Snowie's under Observation as an Judge:
- Justice Snowie, did not read the submission, court filing or affidavit, when she came late to the August 2011, courts and just turned pages glancing at submissions and gave decision.
- Whole system will back Justice Snowie on any order and her being Judge can push throw, children around with out of their house without looking at facts and requests of the Defendant for an trial.
- Justice Snowie, is core reason for the Peel Courts, to throw two children ( ages 2 and 4 ) out of their houses that they owned.
- Plus Gopesh insisted on 8/8/2011 out of few choices offered by courts as the hearing dates and that is the day Justice Snowie was presiding. So there is very very high chances that this was an case where Justice Snowie took bribe monies from Junaid Kayani or Mr. Bhatti as Junaid Kayani had bribed a lady at Land Titles offices to put a note.
Just few hours after serving the documents and further lied to Justice Snowie in Courts, his license should be revoked.
If non LSAT, Lawyers are asked to give LSAT in Canada, they will all never be lawyers in Canada. If Gopesh Soni can get even 50% marks in LSAT, I will award him $500, plus LSAT fees.
These lawyers become lawyers just because they have law degree from a common law country where there is no LSAT. In fact if you are not able to clear LSAT in Canada, go to UK or India and become lawyers and start abusing people in Canada.
As Judges are taught to Trust any Lawyers blindly.
If Lawyers from India, Pakistan and UK that PRACTICE Law in Canada, were required to clear LSAT, most lawyers will have to work in UBER TAXI or Tim Hortens, as 90% will fail LSAT exam.
Canada trusts these foreign Lawyers without clearing LSAT and its not good for the Justice System of Canada. Bad apples are seeping in!
Gopesh Gandu forced me to ask question to Azeem during examination period, when I said i will ask his client later and possibly get an lawyer to look at his clients answers.
To this this Gopesh almost forced me to ask questions to his client azeem right at that time?
“So a police officer who’s willing to lie in the course of any of that proceeding obviously erodes the public faith in the administration of justice.”
NOW I CHALLENGE THIS SAME lying Gopesh soni who fooled Justice Snowie as she trusted Mr. Soni, This LAWYER has TO SHOW THE MONIES HIS CLIENT PAID.
If, IN CANADA you don't HAVE TO PAY MONEY TO BUY THINGS then that rule should be for every one.
SAVE YOUR MONEY TO pay or an LAWYERS TO TAKE OTHER PARTY TO COURTS, RATHER THAN PAYING YOUR OBLIGATIONS.
No ethical Lawyer does such an action. Why was it very important to give these documents a day before when they had since 2011 to file these documents, almost more than a Year.
These documents served by GOPESH SONI, contained all the fake paperwork and fake dates ( later called COE ) . So I dont get time to go to title offices and research the validity.
PLUS JUSTICE SNOWIE GAVE, "abridgment of time for service", for all Fake Documents filed by Gopesh SONI just few hours ago.
Gopesh SONI's knew once an partial summary Judgement is done, it will cost Mr. SINGH, lots monies to undo the partial summary Judgement of Justice Snowie in Courts of Appeal.
Gopesh Soni, Lawyer, lied to the Peel Courts and documents that were full of lies were served to me few hours prior to the hearings.
Few lies by Gopesh Soni, in courts fools an Peel Region Judge Honorable Justice Snowie very easily. No Lawyer can ( should ) lie in submission but yet these lawyers do submit fake dates and information to make Judge that their story is believable.
Gopesh SONI, was also not allowing his client Azeem to answer my questions during cross examination. I asked to cross question Azeem later another day and this Gopesh soni, forced me to take my cross question same time regardless he should have allowed his client to answer all the questions.
Judges blindly trust lawyers and these lawyers play with the trust of these Judges and fool em like a child in kindergarten class. Few Lawyers, not only con customers but the Judges alike.
- Intent to mislead via a fake documents in “Chain of Events” ( hereafter called COE ), To make perjury more trustworthy a COE looks and sounds more correct and believable in the Superior Courts. STEP 1: March30th – Agreement Signed, STEP 2: April 02 – PR1622023 registered ( was rejected by Land Titles Peel offices and not registered on the title ), STEP 3: April 06 – Mail sent. Mail was sent in October or November, after Junaid Kayani was able to bride an poor girl in land titles offices and get a note on the title. These ( M ) Fanatic from Pakistan, will turn Canada into Pakistan soon. ( That lady in Land Title Offices looked very scared and she said she did that note against the Law and wrong and should have only been done if there was an Court order. ).
- In reality all three events were fake. These were stated to fool a trusting Justice Snowie.
- Mr. SONI is a very smart lawyers, he wanted to divert on the day of " Partial Summary Judgements " from payments per the contracts " , which he knew his client has not paid to totally irrelevant direction and paint a credibility picture around the Trust Agreement date and modifications.
- Since Mr. SONI could not prove that monies were paid in full he started to bring issues about " TRUST Agreements " that were totally irrelevant. The game was to divert the mind of Honorable Justice Snowie from real issue of Unpaid - Money to the irrelevant issues of dates and changes in Trust Agreements and Law Society Issues.
- If Hon. Snowie, would have read the trust agreements ( even the one that is disputed ) she would have seen that even that disputed Trust Agreements was not followed and paid at all ( $32,500 ) and was based on the Jan 01, 2009 contract that does not exist and the same disputed trust agreements asks Azeem to pay monthly expenses in full from which walked out.
- In fact Hon. Justice Snowie was only shown two pages of the agreements while there were actually 8 to 10 pages. And on most other pages " Jan 09, 2009, contract was mentioned ".
- Trust Agreement was based on the Jan 01, 2009 contracts that does not exist, and real contract of Jan 09, 2009 was never paid in full till insolvency in May 2009.
- Trust Agreement of March 30th, 2009 does asks Mr. Bhatti to pay monthly expenses that Mr. Bhatti did not pay and walked out in May of 2009. So Mr. SINGH became unpaid seller in May of 2009. Both for the Jan 09 and added agreement of His Trust Agreements
- Trust agreements was purposefully made on a day that I did not visit the offices of the Junaid Kayani so if Mr. SINGH, says about validity of the agreements then courts will think some thing fishy.
- Courts looked at that as escape goat when Mr. SINGH, stated about reporting Mr. Kayani to the Law Society, where Mr. Kayani knew very well that his client from day one has only paid $12,200 out of which 4000 was rent and 3200 was for rental contracts and 5000 for failed purchase
- Mr. Kayani would have purposefully made agreements on another day and changed the original because of past experience as this way the person being sued will divert from the original issues not full filled in the contracts to the contract it self
- When one attacks the validity of a contract the courts take it as an trying to escape the matter.
- Stating in The Courts, that its fake gave false impression about trust that Mr. SINGH is trying to avoid the contracts.
- If Justice Snowie did read the full Trust agreements, she would have noticed that even that modified " TRUST AGREEMENTS " was not followed by Mr. Bhatti.
- But civil law is about attacking and confusing the courts, and not about truth and that is why a long hearings or mini- trials is the only way to know the truth, where the issues are not black and white.
- Mainly the Trust Agreements was tenant in common that only give 50% shares of the house for which beneficiary and trustee and the owner of the rest of the house is same person. So 100% owner is Mr. SINGH. A trustee can not be removed by beneficiary and there is no article in the contracts to sell the house.
GOPESH SONI is unethical Lawyer as he served at my residence KEY documents late evening a few hours before the Hearings next day. ITS ILLEGAL TO GIVE OPPOSITE PARTY ELEMENT OF SURPRISE for any matter, specially when those documents of Gopesh were With rejected LAND TITLE NOTE NUMBER.
Gopesh did not want the Defendant Singh to counter check the documents as there were two major lies in those documents:
1. Rejected title number that would have opened the real matter for Justice in the case.
1/a This rejection was done by the land title offices.
2. Fake visiting date to visit the lawyers of Azeem was also mentioned in the same docs
So Gopesh played trick served docs just few hours before the hearing, through his Girl at the offices just so he can fool Judge Justice Snowie.
But he sure fooled the Judge very nicely as when the judge asked when docs were served, he rotated the answer to such a degree that Snowie forgot the questions.
So Gopesh is best fooler of Peel Courts Judges or Justices.
Since Gopesh Soni, did not answer at courts, when asked by Justice Snowie, when he ( GOPESH ) served Mr. Singh, in order to be granted an Abridgments. Gopesh Soni did what no Lawyers should do, lie to the Courts and mis-direct the courts and fool Justice Snowie that has been taught to trust Lawyers ( only ) in her educations of Law as an Justice.
Really Gopesh fooled Justice Snowie like a kid.
You can only fool some one when some one trusts you.
So that also means Justice Snowie trusted all the lies to Gopesh Gandu in the courts.
Justice Snowie's under Observation as an Judge:
- Justice Snowie, did not read the submission, court filing or affidavit, when she came late to the August 2011, courts and just turned pages glancing at submissions and gave decision.
- Whole system will back Justice Snowie on any order and her being Judge can push throw, children around with out of their house without looking at facts and requests of the Defendant for an trial.
- Justice Snowie, is core reason for the Peel Courts, to throw two children ( ages 2 and 4 ) out of their houses that they owned.
- Plus Gopesh insisted on 8/8/2011 out of few choices offered by courts as the hearing dates and that is the day Justice Snowie was presiding. So there is very very high chances that this was an case where Justice Snowie took bribe monies from Junaid Kayani or Mr. Bhatti as Junaid Kayani had bribed a lady at Land Titles offices to put a note.
Just few hours after serving the documents and further lied to Justice Snowie in Courts, his license should be revoked.
If non LSAT, Lawyers are asked to give LSAT in Canada, they will all never be lawyers in Canada. If Gopesh Soni can get even 50% marks in LSAT, I will award him $500, plus LSAT fees.
These lawyers become lawyers just because they have law degree from a common law country where there is no LSAT. In fact if you are not able to clear LSAT in Canada, go to UK or India and become lawyers and start abusing people in Canada.
As Judges are taught to Trust any Lawyers blindly.
If Lawyers from India, Pakistan and UK that PRACTICE Law in Canada, were required to clear LSAT, most lawyers will have to work in UBER TAXI or Tim Hortens, as 90% will fail LSAT exam.
Canada trusts these foreign Lawyers without clearing LSAT and its not good for the Justice System of Canada. Bad apples are seeping in!
Gopesh Gandu forced me to ask question to Azeem during examination period, when I said i will ask his client later and possibly get an lawyer to look at his clients answers.
To this this Gopesh almost forced me to ask questions to his client azeem right at that time?
“So a police officer who’s willing to lie in the course of any of that proceeding obviously erodes the public faith in the administration of justice.”
NOW I CHALLENGE THIS SAME lying Gopesh soni who fooled Justice Snowie as she trusted Mr. Soni, This LAWYER has TO SHOW THE MONIES HIS CLIENT PAID.
If, IN CANADA you don't HAVE TO PAY MONEY TO BUY THINGS then that rule should be for every one.
SAVE YOUR MONEY TO pay or an LAWYERS TO TAKE OTHER PARTY TO COURTS, RATHER THAN PAYING YOUR OBLIGATIONS.
No ethical Lawyer does such an action. Why was it very important to give these documents a day before when they had since 2011 to file these documents, almost more than a Year.
These documents served by GOPESH SONI, contained all the fake paperwork and fake dates ( later called COE ) . So I dont get time to go to title offices and research the validity.
PLUS JUSTICE SNOWIE GAVE, "abridgment of time for service", for all Fake Documents filed by Gopesh SONI just few hours ago.
Gopesh SONI's knew once an partial summary Judgement is done, it will cost Mr. SINGH, lots monies to undo the partial summary Judgement of Justice Snowie in Courts of Appeal.
Gopesh Soni, Lawyer, lied to the Peel Courts and documents that were full of lies were served to me few hours prior to the hearings.
Few lies by Gopesh Soni, in courts fools an Peel Region Judge Honorable Justice Snowie very easily. No Lawyer can ( should ) lie in submission but yet these lawyers do submit fake dates and information to make Judge that their story is believable.
Gopesh SONI, was also not allowing his client Azeem to answer my questions during cross examination. I asked to cross question Azeem later another day and this Gopesh soni, forced me to take my cross question same time regardless he should have allowed his client to answer all the questions.
Judges blindly trust lawyers and these lawyers play with the trust of these Judges and fool em like a child in kindergarten class. Few Lawyers, not only con customers but the Judges alike.
Gopesh SONI, was also not allowing his client Azeem to answer my questions during cross examination. I asked to cross question Azeem later another day and this Gopesh soni, forced me to take my cross question same time regardless he should have allowed his client to answer all the questions.
Judges blindly trust lawyers and these lawyers play with the trust of these Judges and fool em like a child in kindergarten class. Few Lawyers, not only con customers but the Judges alike.
- Intent to mislead via a fake documents in “Chain of Events” ( hereafter called COE ), To make perjury more trustworthy a COE looks and sounds more correct and believable in the Superior Courts. STEP 1: March30th – Agreement Signed, STEP 2: April 02 – PR1622023 registered ( was rejected by Land Titles Peel offices and not registered on the title ), STEP 3: April 06 – Mail sent. Mail was sent in October or November, after Junaid Kayani was able to bride an poor girl in land titles offices and get a note on the title. These ( M ) Fanatic from Pakistan, will turn Canada into Pakistan soon. ( That lady in Land Title Offices looked very scared and she said she did that note against the Law and wrong and should have only been done if there was an Court order. ).
- In reality all three events were fake. These were stated to fool a trusting Justice Snowie.
- Mr. SONI is a very smart lawyers, he wanted to divert on the day of " Partial Summary Judgements " from payments per the contracts " , which he knew his client has not paid to totally irrelevant direction and paint a credibility picture around the Trust Agreement date and modifications.
- Since Mr. SONI could not prove that monies were paid in full he started to bring issues about " TRUST Agreements " that were totally irrelevant. The game was to divert the mind of Honorable Justice Snowie from real issue of Unpaid - Money to the irrelevant issues of dates and changes in Trust Agreements and Law Society Issues.
- If Hon. Snowie, would have read the trust agreements ( even the one that is disputed ) she would have seen that even that disputed Trust Agreements was not followed and paid at all ( $32,500 ) and was based on the Jan 01, 2009 contract that does not exist and the same disputed trust agreements asks Azeem to pay monthly expenses in full from which walked out.
- In fact Hon. Justice Snowie was only shown two pages of the agreements while there were actually 8 to 10 pages. And on most other pages " Jan 09, 2009, contract was mentioned ".
- Trust Agreement was based on the Jan 01, 2009 contracts that does not exist, and real contract of Jan 09, 2009 was never paid in full till insolvency in May 2009.
- Trust Agreement of March 30th, 2009 does asks Mr. Bhatti to pay monthly expenses that Mr. Bhatti did not pay and walked out in May of 2009. So Mr. SINGH became unpaid seller in May of 2009. Both for the Jan 09 and added agreement of His Trust Agreements
- Trust agreements was purposefully made on a day that I did not visit the offices of the Junaid Kayani so if Mr. SINGH, says about validity of the agreements then courts will think some thing fishy.
- Courts looked at that as escape goat when Mr. SINGH, stated about reporting Mr. Kayani to the Law Society, where Mr. Kayani knew very well that his client from day one has only paid $12,200 out of which 4000 was rent and 3200 was for rental contracts and 5000 for failed purchase
- Mr. Kayani would have purposefully made agreements on another day and changed the original because of past experience as this way the person being sued will divert from the original issues not full filled in the contracts to the contract it self
- When one attacks the validity of a contract the courts take it as an trying to escape the matter.
- Stating in The Courts, that its fake gave false impression about trust that Mr. SINGH is trying to avoid the contracts.
- If Justice Snowie did read the full Trust agreements, she would have noticed that even that modified " TRUST AGREEMENTS " was not followed by Mr. Bhatti.
- But civil law is about attacking and confusing the courts, and not about truth and that is why a long hearings or mini- trials is the only way to know the truth, where the issues are not black and white.
- Mainly the Trust Agreements was tenant in common that only give 50% shares of the house for which beneficiary and trustee and the owner of the rest of the house is same person. So 100% owner is Mr. SINGH. A trustee can not be removed by beneficiary and there is no article in the contracts to sell the house.
No comments:
Post a Comment