Canada's new law allows a buyer to sign a contract and not pay for the goods. Once the goods are repossessed for unpaid terms of the contracts the buyer can come to courts after 2 years and ask the courts to sell not only his goods but the whole shop at current market value.
This is a great news for people to not pay and just sign a contract and own the goods. Thanks to a very caring and very amazing Judge, Hon Justice Snowie, in the Ontario Peel Region courts system. This Judge is a real Messiah to all defaulters and great angel sent from heavens to hear the appeal of non paying customers.
To own the goods just sign a contract.
In fact Mr. Bhatti did not even show more than $8200 in total paid. In his affidavit this $8200 was paid for rental of the house and not for the payments towards his down payments.
$32500 was to be paid and on going expenses a total of approx $1000 or more per month.
Non paying buyers are awarded for bringing people to courts that follow the law and contracts as sellers.
Contract is more valuable then the actually paying for the contracts .
http://www.truthinjustice.org/recent.htm
THE FOLLOWING PART OF THE LAW IS INVALID IN ONTARIO FOR THE Sale of Goods Act
"PART IV
An amazing order made by The Honourable Lorna-Lee Snowie, now allows any one to own a property by just paying, partial payments in form of few dollars and own the property that is 100 times more than the payments made. $500,000 Cars or even CN tower can now be sold for say $20000.00.
Blessings for all people to now own things for free, specially those that do not like pay monies and have a mind set to get things for free.
Blessing and Good Wishes to all, the misery of one person becomes blessings for all.
This Partial Summary Judgement was granted by The Honourable Lorna-Lee Snowie on the 8th of August, 2012 against Ajinder SINGH who was the seller of a shares in a property and the buyer only paid $1500 in construction works done to the house. This buyer from a Rogers Communications was able to avail 50% shares in the house for free.
Every Canadian can now take advantage of this great law that per the law of precedence allows a buyer to own the property for free without paying in full for the agreed terms of the contracts.
Thanks to The Honourable Lorna-Lee Snowie for such remarkable order made for the benefits of general poor people to sign a contract with any one and without paying in full own the property or the goods.
http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/scj/en/judges/ are most remarkable judges in the world of awareness of laws and reading the material that is in submissions to their offices.
This is a great news for people to not pay and just sign a contract and own the goods. Thanks to a very caring and very amazing Judge, Hon Justice Snowie, in the Ontario Peel Region courts system. This Judge is a real Messiah to all defaulters and great angel sent from heavens to hear the appeal of non paying customers.
To own the goods just sign a contract.
In fact Mr. Bhatti did not even show more than $8200 in total paid. In his affidavit this $8200 was paid for rental of the house and not for the payments towards his down payments.
$32500 was to be paid and on going expenses a total of approx $1000 or more per month.
Non paying buyers are awarded for bringing people to courts that follow the law and contracts as sellers.
Contract is more valuable then the actually paying for the contracts .
http://www.truthinjustice.org/recent.htm
THE FOLLOWING PART OF THE LAW IS INVALID IN ONTARIO FOR THE Sale of Goods Act
"PART IV
RIGHTS OF UNPAID SELLER
AGAINST THE GOODS
AGAINST THE GOODS
Interpretation
37. (1) The seller of goods shall be deemed to be an “unpaid seller” within the meaning of this Act,
(a) when the whole of the price has not been paid or tendered;
(b) when a bill of exchange or other negotiable instrument has been received as conditional payment and the condition on which it was received has not been fulfilled by reason of the dishonour of the instrument or otherwise."
An amazing order made by The Honourable Lorna-Lee Snowie, now allows any one to own a property by just paying, partial payments in form of few dollars and own the property that is 100 times more than the payments made. $500,000 Cars or even CN tower can now be sold for say $20000.00.
Blessings for all people to now own things for free, specially those that do not like pay monies and have a mind set to get things for free.
Blessing and Good Wishes to all, the misery of one person becomes blessings for all.
This Partial Summary Judgement was granted by The Honourable Lorna-Lee Snowie on the 8th of August, 2012 against Ajinder SINGH who was the seller of a shares in a property and the buyer only paid $1500 in construction works done to the house. This buyer from a Rogers Communications was able to avail 50% shares in the house for free.
Every Canadian can now take advantage of this great law that per the law of precedence allows a buyer to own the property for free without paying in full for the agreed terms of the contracts.
Thanks to The Honourable Lorna-Lee Snowie for such remarkable order made for the benefits of general poor people to sign a contract with any one and without paying in full own the property or the goods.
http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/scj/en/judges/ are most remarkable judges in the world of awareness of laws and reading the material that is in submissions to their offices.
PART IV
RIGHTS OF UNPAID SELLER
AGAINST THE GOODS
RIGHTS OF UNPAID SELLER
AGAINST THE GOODS
Interpretation
37. (1) The seller of goods shall be deemed to be an “unpaid seller” within the meaning of this Act,
(a) when the whole of the price has not been paid or tendered;
(b) when a bill of exchange or other negotiable instrument has been received as conditional payment and the condition on which it was received has not been fulfilled by reason of the dishonour of the instrument or otherwise.
Idem
(2) In this Part, “seller” includes a person who is in the position of a seller, as for instance an agent of the seller to whom the bill oflading has been endorsed, or a consignor or agent who has paid or is directly responsible for the price. R.S.O. 1990, c. S.1, s. 37.
Rights of unpaid seller
38. (1) Subject to this Act and any statute in that behalf, although the property in the goods may have passed to the buyer, the unpaid seller of goods, as such, has by implication of law,
(a) a lien on the goods or right to retain them for the price while in possession of them;
(b) in case of the insolvency of the buyer, a right of stopping the goods in the course of transit after parting with the possession ofthem;
(c) a right of resale as limited by this Act.
Withholding delivery
(2) Where the property in goods has not passed to the buyer, the unpaid seller has, in addition to other remedies, a right ofwithholding delivery similar to and co-extensive with the rights of lien and stoppage in the course of transit where the property has passed to the buyer. R.S.O. 1990, c. S.1, s. 38.
Unpaid seller’s lien
39. (1) Subject to this Act, the unpaid seller of goods who is in possession of them is entitled to retain possession of them until payment or tender of the price,
(a) where the goods have been sold without any stipulation as to credit;
(b) where the goods have been sold on credit but the term of credit has expired; or
(c) where the buyer becomes insolvent.
Seller in possession as agent
(2) The seller may exercise a right of lien even though the seller is in possession of the goods as agent or bailee for the buyer. R.S.O. 1990, c. S.1, s. 39.
Where part delivery has been made
40. Where an unpaid seller has made part delivery of the goods, the seller may exercise a right of lien or retention on the remainder unless the part delivery has been made under such circumstances as show an agreement to waive the lien or right of retention. R.S.O. 1990, c. S.1, s. 40.
Termination of lien
(a) when the seller delivers the goods to a carrier or other bailee for the purpose of transmission to the buyer without reserving the right of disposal of the goods;
(b) when the buyer or buyer’s agent lawfully obtains possession of the goods; or
(c) by waiver thereof.
Lien not lost by obtaining judgment for price
(2) The unpaid seller of goods having a lien or right of retention thereon does not lose a lien or right of retention by reason only that the seller has obtained judgment for the price of the goods. R.S.O. 1990, c. S.1, s. 41.
Right of stoppage in transit
42. Subject to this Act, when the buyer of goods becomes insolvent, the unpaid seller who has parted with the possession of thegoods has the right of stopping them in the course of transit, that is to say, the unpaid seller may resume possession of the goods as long as they are in course of transit, and may retain them until payment or tender of the price. R.S.O. 1990, c. S.1, s. 42.
Duration of transit
43. (1) Goods shall be deemed to be in course of transit from the time they are delivered to a carrier by land or water or other bailee for the purpose of transmission to the buyer until the buyer or buyer’s agent in that behalf takes delivery of them from such carrier or other bailee.
Buyer obtaining delivery
(2) If the buyer or buyer’s agent in that behalf obtains delivery of the goods before their arrival at the appointed destination, the transit is at an end.
Carrier holding goods to buyer’s order
(3) If after the arrival of the goods at the appointed destination the carrier or other bailee acknowledges to the buyer or buyer’s agent that the goods are held on the buyer’s behalf and continues in possession of them as bailee for the buyer or buyer’s agent, the transit is at an end and it is immaterial that a further destination for the goods may have been indicated by the buyer.
Rejected goods
(4) If the goods are rejected by the buyer and the carrier or other bailee continues in possession of them, the transit shall be deemed not to be at an end even if the seller has refused to receive them back.
Ship chartered by buyer
(5) When goods are delivered to a ship chartered by the buyer, it is a question depending on the circumstances of the particular case whether they are in the possession of the master as a carrier or as agent to the buyer.
Wrongful refusal to deliver
(6) Where the carrier or other bailee wrongfully refuses to deliver the goods to the buyer or buyer’s agent in that behalf, the transit shall be deemed to be at an end.
Where part delivery has been made
(7) Where part delivery of the goods has been made to the buyer or buyer’s agent in that behalf, the remainder of the goods may be stopped in the course of transit unless the part delivery has been made under such circumstances as show an agreement to give up possession of the whole of the goods. R.S.O. 1990, c. S.1, s. 43.
Seller’s right of stoppage
44. (1) The unpaid seller may exercise a right of stoppage in the course of transit either by taking actual possession of the goods or by giving notice of a claim to the carrier or other bailee in whose possession the goods are, and such notice may be given either to the person in actual possession of the goods or to the person’s principal, and in the latter case the notice to be effectual shall be given at such time and under such circumstances that the principal by the exercise of reasonable diligence may communicate it to the principal’s servant or agent in time to prevent a delivery to the buyer.
Redelivery after notice to carrier, etc.
(2) When notice of stoppage in the course of transit is given by the seller to the carrier or other bailee in possession of the goods, thegoods shall be redelivered to or according to the directions of the seller, and the expenses of such redelivery shall be borne by the seller.R.S.O. 1990, c. S.1, s. 44.
Effect of subsale or pledge by buyer
45. Subject to this Act, the unpaid seller’s right of lien or retention or stoppage in the course of transit is not affected by any sale or other disposition of the goods that the buyer may have made, unless the seller has assented thereto, but where a document of title to goodshas been lawfully transferred to a person as buyer or owner of the goods and that person transfers the document to a person who takes the document in good faith and for valuable consideration, then, if the last-mentioned transfer was by way of sale, the unpaid seller’s right oflien or retention or stoppage in the course of transit is defeated, and if the last-mentioned transfer was by way of pledge or other disposition for value, the unpaid seller’s right of lien or retention or stoppage in the course of transit can only be exercised subject to the rights of the transferee. R.S.O. 1990, c. S.1, s. 45.
Exercise of right of lien or stoppage, effect on contract
46. (1) Subject to this section, a contract of sale is not rescinded by the mere exercise by an unpaid seller of a right of lien or retention or stoppage in the course of transit.
Title of buyer on resale
(2) Where an unpaid seller who has exercised a right of lien or retention or stoppage in the course of transit resells the goods, the buyer acquires a good title thereto as against the original buyer.
Resale and right to damages for breach of contract
(3) Where the goods are of a perishable nature or where the unpaid seller gives notice to the buyer of intention to resell and the buyer does not within a reasonable time pay or tender the price, the unpaid seller may resell the goods and recover from the original buyer damages for any loss occasioned by a breach of contract.
Where resale rescinds contract
(4) Where the seller expressly reserves a right of resale in case the buyer should make default, and on the buyer making default, resells the goods, the original contract of sale is thereby rescinded, but without prejudice to any claim the seller may have for damages.R.S.O. 1990, c. S.1, s. 46.
Seller may maintain action for price
47. (1) Where, under a contract of sale, the property in the goods has passed to the buyer and the buyer wrongfully neglects or refuses to pay for the goods according to the terms of the contract, the seller may maintain an action against the buyer for the price of thegoods.
Where property in goods has not passed
(2) Where under a contract of sale the price is payable on a day certain, irrespective of delivery, and the buyer wrongfully neglects or refuses to pay the price, the seller may maintain an action for the price although the property in the goods has not passed and the goodshave not been appropriated to the contract. R.S.O. 1990, c. S.1, s. 47.
No comments:
Post a Comment